Hydro Empowerment Network
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Work
    • Approach
    • Advocacy
    • Exchanges
    • Tools
    • Partnerships
  • Our Members
  • Blog
  • Contact

the flow

WHY MANUFACTURING STANDARDS MATTER

7/20/2020

1 Comment

 
Have you heard about our SEEED initiative?  Social Enterprise for Energy, Ecological and Economic Development (SEEED) is about supporting local practitioners and communities to transition to a sustainable approach to micro hydro, rooted in social enterprise.  It’s about unlocking the potential for hydro mini-grids to bring long term environmental and socioeconomic benefits — to support empowerment that goes well beyond kilowatts.  
Picture
As we continue to develop this initiative, we want to facilitate a closer look at the core elements that are needed to make SEEED happen.  Firstly, reliable mini-grid technology is at the very heart of the solution.  High-quality technical components provide the basis for long-lived, high-impact systems.  This starts at the very first stage of the project: the quality of design, manufacturing, and installation.  Appropriate standards for these steps can play a significant role in increasing technical reliability.

In this regard, HPNET has developed the MHP Standards Tool, in collaboration with Tonibung, Green Empowerment, with support from the WISIONS SEPS, which compiles standards and best practices from different countries.  It can be accessed here.  We are working to add more standards to the Tool and welcome your inputs.  

​For certain technical aspects -- such as manufacturing -- standards do not yet exist.  In this article, HPNET member Joe Butchers sheds light on the “why” and the “how” of manufacturing standards for micro hydro quality verification, drawing on experiences from Nepal.

What is a standard?
​

A standard is a document that regulates expectations for a process, service, or product [1]. If a company is able to demonstrate that they have followed a particular standard, it shows that they have achieved an acceptable level of quality and are compliant with the regulations. For a product, they might indicate the expected dimensions, tolerances, and materials. Engineers use them as guidance when producing engineering drawings or writing technical documents. They guide the decisions made by designers when producing engineering drawings that are used by machinists, fabricators, and technicians. 

How are standards used in micro/mini hydro?

Within mini/micro-hydropower, the use of standards can ensure equipment performs as required and that there is similarity between equipment produced by different manufacturers. As mini/micro-power sites are often located in remote regions, adherence to standards helps to reduce downtime. When engineers travel to a site for maintenance, they are aware of the type of equipment that they will find, increasing the possibility that they can repair the equipment quickly. If a part requires replacement, it can be ordered to site with confidence that it will be fit for purpose. 
What are consequences of not enforcing manufacturing standards?

In Nepal, a reference micro-hydropower standard was first published in 2005 [2]. The standard provides a comprehensive overview of turbine selection, materials, dimensions, and design for electro-mechanical and civil components. Nowadays, the standard is not widely used by manufacturers nor applied during quality verification. This has resulted in a number of outcomes: 
  • variation in installed equipment and its quality; 
  • low quotation prices from unproven companies; 
  • long downtimes as typically the original manufacturer is expected to carry out repairs. 
How can the type of funding support impact quality?
​

In Nepal, where the vast majority of projects depend upon a subsidy, there is a significant opportunity to incorporate quality verification that considers adherence to the manufacturing standard. As recommended by the World Bank, a multi-stage inspection would ensure that there was quality in manufacture, construction, and installation [3]. Whilst expensive to integrate, the reduction in project failure and frequent repairs will save money in the long terms. In addition, the introduction of such checks forces manufacturers to improve the quality of constructed parts.  The cost to manufacturers of not achieving a required standard would swiftly lead to changes in approach. 

In locations where the subsidy driven model is less common, hydropower standards remain important. Where projects are private or donor funded, a required standard can be demanded from a manufacturer and agreed contractually. The project developer can conduct a quality check themselves or employ someone to do so, ensuring that the equipment meets the standard. HPNET has collected available standards online, these documents capture the experience of practitioners working across the world. To improve the status of micro/mini-hydro in relation to other electrification alternatives, ensuring quality is essential. By meeting the requirements of standards, manufacturers can ensure that hydro-mechanical systems deliver their expected power throughout their lifetime. 

References
  1. https://fractory.com/5-iso-standards-manufacturers/
  2. AEPC. Reference micro-hydro standard. 2005. 
  3. World Bank. Mini and micro-hydropower applications. 2015. 

Guest blog written by HPNET member Joe Butchers, a PhD Researcher at the University of Bristol, Electrical Energy Management Group.
1 Comment
Taylor Hicken link
3/4/2021 09:03:30 pm

I appreciated it when you shared that it is important for a manufacturing company to portray an acceptable level of quality and compliance with the regulations. This can be achieved by incorporating the right machine that is suitable for its operations. I would like to think if a manufacturing company wants to improve its quality, it should consider getting the right machine from a reliable supplier.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Categories

    All
    Afghanistan
    Africa
    Bangladesh
    Bhutan
    Cameroon
    Context Profile
    Earth Voices
    Electronic Load Controllers
    Environmental Impact
    Ethiopia
    Events
    Finance
    Gender Equity
    Germany
    Gram Vikas
    Grid Interconnectivity
    Hidden No More
    India
    Indigenous Community
    Indonesia
    Integrated Energy Planning
    International Rivers
    Knowledge Exchange
    Knowledge Tools
    Load Management
    Local Fabrication
    Madagascar
    Malawi
    Malaysia
    Member Profiles
    Mini Hydro
    Myanmar
    Nepal
    Nicaragua
    Pakistan
    Philippines
    Pico Hydro
    Podcasts
    Practice To Policy
    Practice-to-Policy
    Practitioner Profile
    Productive End Use
    Rehabilitation
    Research
    SEEED
    SIBAT
    Sri Lanka
    StreamSide Chats
    Toolkit
    Training Centers
    Videos
    Watersheds
    Webinars
    Yamog

    Archives

    December 2024
    February 2023
    January 2023
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    March 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

HOME
ABOUT US
OUR WORK

OUR MEMBERS
BLOG
CONTACT
© 2015 - 2023
​Hydro Empowerment Network

Proudly powered by Weebly